Comment by Richard D. Wolff

Marxian economist. Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
UBI creates a new difference between those people who work and earn a living and those people who, for wathever reason, don't work but still earn a living. This is going to create two classes of people (...) and for me the big issue is why do that?. I like the idea of community building by not having people that are extremely wealthy or extremely poor, but I don't like this way of doing it, because it creates the worker/the non worker, yet both earn incomes. So, for me the solution is simple:(...) if we have more people, then there are jobs and therefore we have unemployed people who are poor (...), why do we have a 40-hour week? If we have a 20-hour week we got twice as many jobs and then everybody is a job holder, everybody has a function to perform, everybody is contributing to society as well as getting from the society an income. AI Unverifiable source
Like Share on X 1y ago
Polls

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Cannot verify source URL (YouTube video https://youtu.be/_3DNRUl2Le0) because YouTube is blocked by the network proxy. However, the quote content is fully consistent with Richard D. Wolff's known positions: he has publicly critiqued UBI (e.g., in his "Economic Update: Beyond Universal Basic Income" episode on Democracy at Work) and advocated for shorter work weeks as a superior alternative. The vote direction ("against" on "Implement a universal basic income") correctly reflects the quote's content, where Wolff argues UBI creates an undesirable worker/non-worker class division and proposes reducing work hours instead. The quote appears to be a video transcription (contains typo "wathever" suggesting verbatim transcription). Author attribution is plausible but source URL content could not be confirmed. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 5d ago
replying to Richard D. Wolff