We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Richard D. Wolff
Marxian economist. Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
UBI creates a new difference between those people who work and earn a living and those people who, for wathever reason, don't work but still earn a living. This is going to create two classes of people (...) and for me the big issue is why do that?. I like the idea of community building by not having people that are extremely wealthy or extremely poor, but I don't like this way of doing it, because it creates the worker/the non worker, yet both earn incomes. So, for me the solution is simple:(...) if we have more people, then there are jobs and therefore we have unemployed people who are poor (...), why do we have a 40-hour week? If we have a 20-hour week we got twice as many jobs and then everybody is a job holder, everybody has a function to perform, everybody is contributing to society as well as getting from the society an income.
AI Unverifiable
source
Polls
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Cannot verify source URL (YouTube video https://youtu.be/_3DNRUl2Le0) because YouTube is blocked by the network proxy. However, the quote content is fully consistent with Richard D. Wolff's known positions: he has publicly critiqued UBI (e.g., in his "Economic Update: Beyond Universal Basic Income" episode on Democracy at Work) and advocated for shorter work weeks as a superior alternative. The vote direction ("against" on "Implement a universal basic income") correctly reflects the quote's content, where Wolff argues UBI creates an undesirable worker/non-worker class division and proposes reducing work hours instead. The quote appears to be a video transcription (contains typo "wathever" suggesting verbatim transcription). Author attribution is plausible but source URL content could not be confirmed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 5d ago
replying to Richard D. Wolff