We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ian Gough
Economist. London School of Economics.
The underlying belief or dream is that basic income will provide a mobilising theme to bring about radical change. There is no evidence anywhere in the world for this. Similar proposals have been made every few years for the last 50 years and they have got nowhere (and I do not mention Switzerland). The problem is that it combines a radical vision with a naive or insouciant view of politics. I fear that this latest plan will drain the energies of the left in social policy and will divert attention from so many other worthwhile policy alternatives: the living wage, boosting trade unionism, free childcare, radical changes in housing policy, policies to reduce working time to limit turbo-consumption, green investment and so on.Disputed source (2016)
2y ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The Guardian page for Ian Gough’s letter, published on June 10, 2016, does contain the opening and closing sentences from the submitted passage and attributes the letter to “Professor Ian Gough.” However, the submitted quote is not strictly verbatim as written: the source includes two intervening sentences between the sentence ending with “a naive or insouciant view of politics” and the sentence beginning “I fear that this latest plan...”. Because those omissions are not marked with [...], this version is materially altered rather than exact. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/10/potential-benefits-and-pitfalls-of-a-universal-basic-income))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Unverifiable
Cannot verify source URL (theguardian.com blocks automated access). However, author attribution and vote alignment both check out: Ian Gough is an economist at LSE well-known for criticizing UBI and advocating Universal Basic Services. The quote's arguments (no evidence UBI drives radical change, diverts energy from alternatives like living wage, trade unionism, free childcare, housing policy, etc.) are fully consistent with his published work, including his 2020 essay "A False Promise" on the Great Transition Initiative. The vote "against" on "Implement a universal basic income" correctly reflects the quote's stance.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 3mo ago
AI Unverifiable
Author attribution: CONFIRMED. Ian Gough is an economist at the London School of Economics, known for his critical stance on universal basic income. Web search confirms he has expressed this exact concern about UBI "draining the energies of the left" and diverting attention from other progressive policies. Vote alignment: CORRECT. The quote clearly argues against implementing UBI, and the vote is recorded as "against" on "Implement a universal basic income". Source URL verification: BLOCKED. The Guardian (www.theguardian.com) blocks automated fetching, so I cannot confirm the source URL directly contains this quote. The article title ("potential benefits and pitfalls of a universal basic income", June 2016) is plausible as a source for this quote. Marked as ai_unverifiable because the source URL could not be fetched.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 3mo ago
replying to Ian Gough