Comment by Anke Hassel

Sociologist. Professor at the Hertie School of Governance. Director of Hans Böckler Foundation’s WSI
The basic income will further divide society and prevent social mobility. Those who, due to their family background, have good prospects for interesting employment and high income will maintain their existing work ethic, engaging in school and study, and maybe taking a sabbatical or two in between. This is a good thing. However, life will become more difficult for young people from parts of society already at a disadvantage in terms of education – those from working class and migrant families. The sweet poison of the basic income will accompany them in every step of their school life and vocational training.(...) There is still a lot of work necessary to improve society that cannot be accomplished through the labour market, but that still needs to be acknowledged. But the unconditional basic income is the wrong way to accomplish this. AI Verified source
Like Share on X 1y ago
Polls

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is from Anke Hassel's article "Unconditional Basic Income Is A Dead End" published on Social Europe (originally in Süddeutsche Zeitung, 7 Feb 2017). Search results confirm the article's content matches the quote text, including the "sweet poison" phrasing and arguments about social mobility and working class/migrant families. Author attribution confirmed: Anke Hassel is Professor of Public Policy at the Hertie School of Governance. Vote "against" on "Implement a universal basic income" correctly reflects the quote's clear opposition to UBI. Updated source_url from date-path version to canonical URL. Could not directly fetch socialeurope.eu (blocked by egress proxy) but multiple search results corroborate the content. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 4d ago
replying to Anke Hassel