Comment by Tom Kibasi

Progressive think-tank IPPR director.
Embedded in the idea of universal basic income is the assumption that some jobs are worthwhile, and others not. Some may sneer at “McJobs”—but cleaners in McDonald’s stop infections, just as cleaners in NHS hospitals do.(...) Proponents of UBI ignore the value of such work: it only makes sense to be emancipated from an obligation that is inherently undesirable. Yet the universal basic income institutionalises the gap between the disproportionate and increasing rewards for the few and stagnant wages and poor prospects for the many. It fails to broaden the scope of useful work, which includes activities that have a significant social benefit but an economic cost. (...) Its supporters do not see the enormous potential for social division that universal basic income would bring with it. For those on the right who are convinced that the world is divided between “wealth creators” and everyone else, it would be a brilliant tool to discard much of society. AI Verified source
Like Share on X 1y ago
Polls

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is from "A Universal Basic Mistake" published in Prospect Magazine on 16 June 2016, co-authored by Jon Cruddas and Tom Kibasi (Kibasi was IPPR director at the time). Key phrases confirmed: "McJobs", cleaners in McDonald's/NHS, "wealth creators", social division. The vote direction "against" on "Implement a universal basic income" correctly matches the anti-UBI stance of the article. Updated source_url from /magazine/ path to the current /essays/42947/ path. Note: the article is co-authored with Jon Cruddas, not solely by Kibasi, but attribution to Kibasi as co-author is acceptable. Could not directly fetch the source URL (domain blocked by proxy), but web search results from multiple academic citations confirm the article's content and authorship. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 4d ago
replying to Tom Kibasi