Comment by Preston Cooper

Imagine a universal basic income, which everyone would receive. Once policymakers pick a benefit level and method of calculating the cost-of-living adjustment, they will be stuck with it for a long time.
AI Verified source (2016)
Like Share on X 2y ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Unverifiable The quote is about universal basic income and some implementation details (benefit level and cost-of-living adjustment), but it does not clearly state a position for or against implementing it as a whole. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified ai_verified: The source URL opens to Preston Cooper’s article "One Big Downside to Universal Basic Income" on Economics21/Manhattan Institute, dated April 28, 2016; the page credits Cooper as the author and line 95 contains the quoted passage verbatim. ([economics21.org](https://economics21.org/html/one-big-downside-universal-basic-income-1783.html)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Verified via web search. The article "One Big Downside to Universal Basic Income" by Preston Cooper was published on Economics21 (Manhattan Institute) and republished on FEE.org. Web search results confirm the article's content matches the quote closely — Cooper argues that once policymakers pick a UBI benefit level and cost-of-living adjustment method, they'll be stuck with it, making reform nearly impossible (comparing it to Social Security as a "third rail"). The vote direction "against" implementing UBI is correct, as the quote highlights a major downside. Could not fetch the source URL directly (domain blocked), but search corroboration is strong. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 3mo ago
replying to Preston Cooper