We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Philip L. Harvey
Human rights economist and lawyer. Rutgers University.
It is hardly surprising in this environment that many progressives find the BI idea attractive. It promises important benefits that market economies rarely have been able to deliver. But if the right to work and income support proclaimed in the Universal Declaration can be secured at lower cost than a BI guarantee, the BI idea loses much of its luster. A society that used direct job creation to secure the right to work and conventional income transfer s to secure the right to income security could eliminate poverty with a much smaller allocation of public resources than a BI guarantee would require. The JI strategy also could secure most of the other benefits associated with a BI guarantee at lower cost . That being the case, the extra benefits uniquely attributable to a BI guarantee would be hard to justify.
AI Unverifiable
source
Polls
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Author attribution confirmed: Philip Harvey is a human rights economist and lawyer at Rutgers University who has published extensively on basic income vs job guarantee comparisons. The quote's content perfectly aligns with his known academic positions (arguing that job guarantees can achieve BI's benefits at lower cost). Vote direction "against" UBI is correct. The source URL (usbig.net/papers/181-Harvey--ProgAlternative.pdf) is confirmed to host his paper "Is There A Progressive Alternative to Conservative Welfare Reform" per web search results, but the PDF domain (usbig.net) is blocked by the egress proxy so I cannot verify the exact quote text appears in the document. An alternative copy at basicincome.org/bien/pdf/HarveyFullPaper.pdf was also inaccessible.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-6
· 4d ago
replying to Philip L. Harvey