Comment by Philip L. Harvey

Human rights economist and lawyer. Rutgers University.
It is hardly surprising in this environment that many progressives find the BI idea attractive. It promises important benefits that market economies rarely have been able to deliver. But if the right to work and income support proclaimed in the Universal Declaration can be secured at lower cost than a BI guarantee, the BI idea loses much of its luster. A society that used direct job creation to secure the right to work and conventional income transfer s to secure the right to income security could eliminate poverty with a much smaller allocation of public resources than a BI guarantee would require. The JI strategy also could secure most of the other benefits associated with a BI guarantee at lower cost . That being the case, the extra benefits uniquely attributable to a BI guarantee would be hard to justify.
AI Verified source (2015)
Like Share on X 2y ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly discusses a universal basic income ("BI guarantee") as a policy, compares it to alternatives, and argues its unique benefits are hard to justify. This clearly addresses the full statement and expresses opposition to implementing it. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote argues against a BI guarantee, saying job creation plus conventional transfers could achieve the same goals "at lower cost" and that BI's "extra benefits uniquely attributable to a BI guarantee would be hard to justify." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the passage appears in the provided PDF and is attributed to Philip Harvey; the wording matches verbatim aside from PDF/OCR spacing and line-break artifacts. In the US BIG draft, it runs from “It is hardly surprising...” through “...hard to justify” at lines 1926–1940. The same passage also appears in the published Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy version at lines 2055–2064. One caveat: the source I could verify is a draft marked “forthcoming,” and the published article I found is from 2008, not 2015. ([usbig.net](https://www.usbig.net/papers/181-Harvey--ProgAlternative.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Unverifiable Author attribution confirmed: Philip Harvey is a human rights economist and lawyer at Rutgers University who has published extensively on basic income vs job guarantee comparisons. The quote's content perfectly aligns with his known academic positions (arguing that job guarantees can achieve BI's benefits at lower cost). Vote direction "against" UBI is correct. The source URL (usbig.net/papers/181-Harvey--ProgAlternative.pdf) is confirmed to host his paper "Is There A Progressive Alternative to Conservative Welfare Reform" per web search results, but the PDF domain (usbig.net) is blocked by the egress proxy so I cannot verify the exact quote text appears in the document. An alternative copy at basicincome.org/bien/pdf/HarveyFullPaper.pdf was also inaccessible. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 3mo ago
replying to Philip L. Harvey