Comment by Ryan Holmes

In the 1970s, a five-year basic income program in the Canadian province of Manitoba called Mincome showed promising results. Parents spent more time raising children. Students showed higher test scores and lower dropout rates. Hospital visits, mental illness, car accidents, and domestic abuse cases all declined. And in the end, total working hours only slipped by a few percentage points. In other words, having a basic income didn’t lead to sloth or indolence. It let people spend time on the things that mattered: family, education, health, personal fulfillment. If the robots do take our jobs one day—but give us back some of those things in return—it might not be such a bad trade after all.
AI Verified source (2015)
Like Share on X 2y ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly expresses a favorable view of basic income overall: it cites positive results from a basic income program, rejects the objection that it causes idleness, and concludes it "might not be such a bad trade after all." While it does not use the word "universal," it clearly implies support for implementing a basic income policy like UBI. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote speaks positively about a past "basic income program" and says it "didn’t lead to sloth or indolence," but it stops short of clearly endorsing the policy; "it might not be such a bad trade after all" is tentative rather than an unambiguous call to implement universal basic income. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Fast Company’s article “How To Plan Now For Tomorrow’s Robotic Workforce” contains the passage verbatim at lines 130–132, and the piece is attributed to Ryan Holmes at lines 31–33 and 47. The supplied URL variant appears outdated, but the same Fast Company article is available at the canonical URL without the extra `/the-future-of-work/` path segment. ([fastcompany.com](https://www.fastcompany.com/3050757/how-to-plan-now-for-tomorrows-robotic-workforce)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Unverifiable Source URL (fastcompany.com/3050757) returns 403 Forbidden and blocks automated fetching; Wayback Machine fetches are also blocked in this environment. Web searches corroborate that Ryan Holmes (Hootsuite founder) writes for Fast Company and is publicly listed on Wikipedia's "List of advocates of universal basic income," so the "for" vote on "Implement a universal basic income" aligns with his known position. However, I could not directly verify the exact wording of the Mincome passage on the primary source, and I could not locate a more recent (2025-2026) UBI quote from Holmes to replace this 2015 one. Marking ai_unverifiable because the source URL is inaccessible to me rather than inaccurate. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 2mo ago
replying to Ryan Holmes