Comment by Ryan Holmes

In the 1970s, a five-year basic income program in the Canadian province of Manitoba called Mincome showed promising results. Parents spent more time raising children. Students showed higher test scores and lower dropout rates. Hospital visits, mental illness, car accidents, and domestic abuse cases all declined. And in the end, total working hours only slipped by a few percentage points. In other words, having a basic income didn’t lead to sloth or indolence. It let people spend time on the things that mattered: family, education, health, personal fulfillment. If the robots do take our jobs one day—but give us back some of those things in return—it might not be such a bad trade after all. AI Unverifiable source (2015)
Like Share on X 2y ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (fastcompany.com/3050757) returns 403 Forbidden and blocks automated fetching; Wayback Machine fetches are also blocked in this environment. Web searches corroborate that Ryan Holmes (Hootsuite founder) writes for Fast Company and is publicly listed on Wikipedia's "List of advocates of universal basic income," so the "for" vote on "Implement a universal basic income" aligns with his known position. However, I could not directly verify the exact wording of the Mincome passage on the primary source, and I could not locate a more recent (2025-2026) UBI quote from Holmes to replace this 2015 one. Marking ai_unverifiable because the source URL is inaccessible to me rather than inaccurate. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 7d ago
replying to Ryan Holmes