We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by European Union
Political and economic union
2. For high-risk AI systems referred to in points 2 to 8 of Annex III, providers shall follow the conformity assessment procedure based on internal control as referred to in Annex VI, which does not provide for the involvement of a notified body.
3. For high-risk AI systems covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, the provider shall follow the relevant conformity assessment procedure as required under those legal acts. The requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter shall apply to those high-risk AI systems and shall be part of that assessment. Points 4.3., 4.4., 4.5. and the fifth paragraph of point 4.6 of Annex VII shall also apply. For the purposes of that assessment, notified bodies which have been notified under those legal acts shall be entitled to control the conformity of the high-risk AI systems with the requirements set out in Section 2, provided that the compliance of those notified bodies with requirements laid down in Article 31(4), (5), (10) and (11) has been assessed in the context of the notification procedure under those legal acts.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The text is verbatim Article 43(2)–(3) of EU Regulation 2024/1689 (the EU AI Act). For high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III points 2–8, the EU uses an internal-control conformity assessment without a notified body — i.e., NOT a third-party audit by default. Updated year from 2025 to 2024 (Regulation officially published in OJEU on 12 July 2024). Vote "against" the statement "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" matches: the Act explicitly does not mandate third-party audits for most high-risk systems.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 19d ago
replying to European Union