We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Peter Norvig
Computer scientist, AI researcher
You can ask a human, but, you know, what cognitive psychologists have discovered is that when you ask a human you’re not really getting at the decision process. They make a decision first, and then you ask, and then they generate an explanation and that may not be the true explanation. So we might end up being in the same place with machine learning where we train one system to get an answer and then we train another system to say – given the input of this first system, now it’s your job to generate an explanation.AI Verified source (2017)
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
TechCentral’s article “Google’s research chief questions value of explainable AI,” dated 27 June 2017, explicitly says Peter Norvig “said” the first paragraph and then quotes the second paragraph immediately after; the wording matches the supplied text verbatim apart from normal paragraph breaks and quotation marks. That verifies the attribution and the 2017 source. ([techcentral.ie](https://www.techcentral.ie/googles-research-chief-questions-value-explainable-ai/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
AI Verified
Verified: Search results confirm the quote text matches Peter Norvig's remarks at UNSW Sydney as reported in TechCentral.ie on June 28, 2017. Updated year from null to 2017. The exact phrasing about cognitive psychologists, decision-making, and humans generating post-hoc explanations matches confirmed reporting. URL is the legitimate TechCentral.ie article. Vote "against" on "Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable" aligns with Norvig's skeptical questioning of explainable AI's value.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Peter Norvig