Comment by Yoshua Bengio

I think it's really important, because when we put open source out there for something that could be dangerous, which is a tiny minority of all the code that's open source, essentially we're opening the door to all the bad actors. And as these systems become more capable, bad actors don't need to have very strong expertise, whether it's in bioweapons or cybersecurity, in order to take advantage of systems like this.
Verified source (Jul 25, 2023)
Like 1 Share on X 9mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The Register article at the supplied URL does contain this exact wording and attributes it to Yoshua Bengio. However, the official published Senate hearing transcript gives a different opening wording—e.g., “when we put open source out there for something that could be dangerous” and “we’re opening the door to all the bad actors”—even though the later clause about bad actors not needing strong expertise is substantially the same. So this is best treated as a close edited rendering, not a verified verbatim quote from the primary record. ([theregister.com](https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/28/ai_senate_bioweapon/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Verified Migrated from legacy verification · Hector Perez Arenas · 9mo ago
replying to Yoshua Bengio