Comment by U.S. Chamber of Commerce (C_TEC)

[C_TEC urged NIST to avoid defining premature requirements] relating to aspirational standards for AI that have not matured or are not developed yet, including concepts such as "explainability," "auditability," "robust accuracy," and "error-free algorithms." If the RMF defines and deploys these concepts beyond their current development, it will add unnecessary burdens which could stifle innovation. AI Verified source (2021)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Quote text confirmed via web search (uschamber.com blocks WebFetch with 403). The original quote was grammatically broken ("If...as it will...") and missing important context about which "concepts" were being discussed; I edited the opinion to include the correct context: C_TEC urging NIST to avoid premature requirements for "explainability," "auditability," etc. The corrected quote accurately reflects the C_TEC comments on the NIST AI RMF. Vote "against" aligns with the statement "Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable" — the U.S. Chamber explicitly warns against requiring explainability standards, citing innovation concerns. Year 2021 reflects when the comments were submitted. Source URL is the primary source. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 15d ago
replying to U.S. Chamber of Commerce (C_TEC)