We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Abraham C. Meltzer'},
Los Angeles County Superior Court judge
Put bluntly, black box AI systems "do not explain their predictions in a way that humans can understand."Disputed source (2024)
8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
Disputed
The exact sentence appears in Meltzer’s 2024 vLex article at lines 31–32, but Meltzer immediately cites Cynthia Rudin’s 2019 paper for it: “Put bluntly, black box AI systems ‘do not explain their predictions in a way that humans can understand.’ (Rudin, Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models...)” ([law-journals-books.vlex.com](https://law-journals-books.vlex.com/vid/why-black-box-ai-1042499850)) A reliable PMC record for Rudin’s 2019 article also contains the same wording in its introduction/snippet. ([pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9122117/?utm_source=openai)) So the quote is real, but attributing it to Abraham C. Meltzer is materially misleading; the source itself attributes the wording to Rudin.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote 'do not explain their predictions in a way that humans can understand' is confirmed verbatim from Hon. Abraham C. Meltzer's 2024 California Lawyers Association article 'Why Black Box AI Evidence Should Not Be Allowed In Criminal Cases'. Vote 'for' aligns with statement 'Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable' since Meltzer argues against opaque/non-interpretable AI systems being used as evidence. Source URL returned 403 to WebFetch but content was confirmed via WebSearch.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Abraham C. Meltzer'},