We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Eliezer Yudkowsky
AI researcher and writer
Many researchers steeped in these issues, including myself, expect that the most likely result of building a superhumanly smart AI, under anything remotely like the current circumstances, is that literally everyone on Earth will die. Not as in “maybe possibly some remote chance,” but as in “that is the obvious thing that would happen.” It’s not that you can’t, in principle, survive creating something much smarter than you; it’s that it would require precision and preparation and new scientific insights, and probably not having AI systems composed of giant inscrutable arrays of fractional numbers. Some of my friends have recently reported to me that when people outside the AI industry hear about extinction risk from Artificial General Intelligence for the first time, their reaction is “maybe we should not build AGI, then.” [...] Shut it all down. We are not ready. We are not on track to be significantly readier in the foreseeable future.AI Verified source (2023)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports the statement: the author says creating superhuman AI would most likely mean 'literally everyone on Earth will die' and urges shutting AGI development down. That is an explicit claim of existential threat to humanity from AI.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly says that building a superhumanly smart AI would most likely mean "literally everyone on Earth will die" and refers to "extinction risk" from AGI, so it clearly supports the statement.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses whether to build AGI: it explicitly mentions "maybe we should not build AGI" and concludes "Shut it all down," clearly taking a position against the overall project of building artificial general intelligence.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes building AGI: it says building such AI would likely mean "literally everyone on Earth will die" and concludes, "maybe we should not build AGI, then" and "Shut it all down. We are not ready."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The TIME op-ed "Pausing AI Developments Isn’t Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down," published March 29, 2023 and bylined to Eliezer Yudkowsky, contains these passages verbatim: "literally everyone on Earth will die ... that is the obvious thing that would happen," later "Some of my friends ... maybe we should not build AGI, then," and later "Shut it all down. We are not ready. We are not on track to be significantly readier in the foreseeable future." The [...] is a faithful omission of intervening text from the same article. ([time.com](https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Unverifiable
Quote attributed to Eliezer Yudkowsky from his March 29, 2023 Time op-ed "Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down." WebFetch on time.com source URL returned HTTP 403. Web search corroborates: the op-ed exists at the cited URL, was published in Time, and includes the famous "literally everyone on Earth will die" and "Shut it all down. We are not ready" passages. Vote "against" "Build artificial general intelligence" perfectly aligns with Yudkowsky's shut-it-down position (further reinforced by his 2025 book with Nate Soares, "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies"). Marking ai_unverifiable due to source URL blocking.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Eliezer Yudkowsky