We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Evan Ackerman
IEEE Spectrum robotics senior editor
We’re not going to be able to prevent autonomous armed robots from existing. The real question that we should be asking is this: Could autonomous armed robots perform better than armed humans in combat, resulting in fewer casualties on both sides? [...] The problem with this argument is that no letter, UN declaration, or even a formal ban ratified by multiple nations is going to prevent people from being able to build autonomous, weaponized robots. The barriers keeping people from developing this kind of system are just too low. Consider the “armed quadcopters.” Today you can buy a smartphone-controlled quadrotor for US $300 at Toys R Us. Just imagine what you’ll be able to buy tomorrow. This technology exists. It’s improving all the time. There’s simply too much commercial value in creating quadcopters (and other robots) that have longer endurance, more autonomy, bigger payloads, and everything else that you’d also want in a military system.AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2015)
8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses banning autonomous armed/lethal robots and argues that a formal ban would not prevent their development, framing the issue instead around whether they could reduce casualties. This clearly implies opposition to the policy of banning autonomous lethal weapons.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the supplied IEEE Spectrum URL is Evan Ackerman’s article “We Should Not Ban ‘Killer Robots,’ and Here’s Why,” dated 2015-07-28; it contains the opening sentence at line 94 and the later passage at lines 117–118, so the quote is real and verbatim with [...] marking omitted text. ([spectrum.ieee.org](https://spectrum.ieee.org/we-should-not-ban-killer-robots))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Disputed
IEEE Spectrum’s article "We Should Not Ban ‘Killer Robots,’ and Here’s Why," published July 28, 2015, is by Evan Ackerman. The source contains the first paragraph verbatim near the top and the later paragraph beginning "The problem with this argument..." in the body, but those passages are separated by substantial intervening text. Because the submitted version splices noncontiguous text without marking the omission (for example with [...]), it is not a single verbatim quote as presented. ([spectrum.ieee.org](https://spectrum.ieee.org/we-should-not-ban-killer-robots))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Unverifiable
Quote attributed to Evan Ackerman (IEEE Spectrum robotics senior editor) from his article "We Should Not Ban 'Killer Robots,' and Here's Why" (2015). WebFetch on spectrum.ieee.org source URL returned HTTP 403. Web search confirms verbatim phrases including "We're not going to be able to prevent autonomous armed robots from existing," "Could autonomous armed robots perform better than armed humans in combat, resulting in fewer casualties on both sides?" and the "armed quadcopters" / "Toys R Us" smartphone-controlled quadrotor framing. Year 2015 is correct. Note the opinion currently has no associated vote on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" (vote is null); given the article title and content, the natural vote would be "against" (i.e., do NOT ban). I did not add a vote, as the task is to verify the quote. Marking ai_unverifiable due to source URL blocking.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Evan Ackerman