Comment by U.S. Chamber of Commerce (C_TEC)

The Chamber recognizes the purpose of certification, audits, and assessments as a means for organizations to utilize repeatable and standard methodologies to help them improve the explainability of an algorithm. [...] Furthermore, there are strong apprehensions regarding any mandatory third-party audit requirement. Audits and assessments can costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, which can be cost-prohibitive, especially for start-ups and small businesses that may not have the necessary capital and funding for such expenses. Such an inability to meet compliance costs may lead these organizations to merge with other companies or not enter the market, reducing the overall market size and potentially reducing innovation.
AI Verified source (2023)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly opposes mandatory third-party audits: it expresses 'strong apprehensions regarding any mandatory third-party audit requirement' and argues such audits are too costly. Although it does not mention 'major AI systems' specifically, opposition to 'any' such mandate clearly implies opposition to mandating third-party audits for major AI systems. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly says there are “strong apprehensions regarding any mandatory third-party audit requirement” and argues such audits are too costly and may reduce innovation. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified I confirmed the excerpt on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce page published June 13, 2023. The explainability/audit-apprehension language appears in the first numbered response, and the cost/start-up/innovation language appears later in response 28. The ellipsis joins non-contiguous passages from the same document, but the quoted wording is otherwise verbatim and correctly attributed to the Chamber/C_TEC. ([uschamber.com](https://www.uschamber.com/technology/comments-to-ntia-on-ai-accountability)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Quote authorship and content verified via web search. U.S. Chamber of Commerce (Technology Engagement Center / C_TEC) submitted comments to NTIA's AI Accountability RFC in 2023, voicing 'strong apprehensions regarding any mandatory third-party audit requirement' and noting that audits/assessments 'can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars' — concerns reproduced verbatim in the opinion. uschamber.com URL returns 403 to WebFetch, but the comment letter is real (regulations.gov NTIA-2023-0005) and search results confirm the wording. 'Against' vote on 'Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems' aligns with Chamber's stated opposition to mandatory third-party audit requirements. Year 2023; Chamber's position on this question remains consistent, but the 2023 comment letter is the canonical source for this statement. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to U.S. Chamber of Commerce (C_TEC)