We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Bill Joy
Sun Microsystems cofounder; computer scientist
How soon could such an intelligent robot be built? The coming advances in computing power seem to make it possible by 2030. And once an intelligent robot exists, it is only a small step to a robot species—to an intelligent robot that can make evolved copies of itself. [...] The only realistic alternative I see is relinquishment: to limit development of the technologies that are too dangerous, by limiting our pursuit of certain kinds of knowledge. Yes, I know, knowledge is good, as is the search for new truths. [...] if open access to and unlimited development of knowledge henceforth puts us all in clear danger of extinction, then common sense demands that we reexamine even these basic, long-held beliefs.AI Verified source (2000)
8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly implies support for the statement: it warns that creating "an intelligent robot" could lead to a self-replicating "robot species" and says this could put "us all in clear danger of extinction," which is an existential threat to humanity.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote warns that intelligent robots could lead to a self-reproducing 'robot species' and says such development could put 'us all in clear danger of extinction,' which clearly supports the claim of an existential threat.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly implies opposition to building AGI: after discussing the possibility of creating an "intelligent robot," the author argues for "relinquishment" and to "limit development of the technologies that are too dangerous." That is a clear stance against pursuing the development of AGI-like systems.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote treats an "intelligent robot" as part of "technologies that are too dangerous" and says "the only realistic alternative I see is relinquishment: to limit development" of them, which clearly opposes building AGI.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the WIRED article “Why the Future Doesn't Need Us” on the provided URL identifies Bill Joy as the author and is dated April 1, 2000. It contains the first passage verbatim (“How soon could such an intelligent robot be built? ... make evolved copies of itself.”) and the second passage verbatim apart from the user’s clearly marked omissions with [...]. ([wired.com](https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified: This is from Bill Joy's famous April 2000 Wired essay "Why The Future Doesn't Need Us." The quote about intelligent robots being possible by 2030 and his call for "relinquishment" is accurately reproduced. The Wired URL blocked WebFetch but the text is confirmed via Wikipedia and multiple academic mirrors (e.g., gatech.edu PDF). The vote "against" on "Build artificial general intelligence" aligns with Joy's explicit call to relinquish such dangerous technologies. Year 2000 is correct. I searched for more recent (2025-2026) Bill Joy statements on AGI but found none publicly available; this remains his definitive position.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Bill Joy