Comment by Government of the United Kingdom

Participating countries committed, depending on their circumstances, to the development of appropriate state-led evaluation and safety research while participating companies agreed that they would support the next iteration of their models to undergo appropriate independent evaluation and testing. Multiple participants suggested that existing voluntary commitments would need to be put on a legal or regulatory footing in due course. It was suggested that there might be certain circumstances in which governments should apply the principle that models must be proven to be safe before they are deployed, with a presumption that they are otherwise dangerous. AI Verified source (2023)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified: This is from the "Chair's Summary of the AI Safety Summit 2023, Bletchley Park" published by the UK Government on 2 November 2023. The gov.uk URL was blocked by WebFetch but web search confirms the exact text of these passages from the official Chair's Summary. Year 2023 is correct. Attribution to "Government of the United Kingdom" is appropriate as the UK hosted/chaired the summit and published the summary. The vote "for" on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" aligns with the document's call for independent evaluation/testing of models and the suggestion that voluntary commitments be put on a regulatory footing. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 7d ago
replying to Government of the United Kingdom