We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by TechNet
Tech industry trade association
TechNet believes it is premature to mandate independent third-party auditing of AI systems. Mandating an independent audit before appropriate technical standards and conformity assessment requirements are established could open AI systems to national security threats, trade secrets theft, and inaccurate audit reports. We believe AI auditing standards, ethics, or oversight rules must consider the use-case-specific auditing needs, calibrated to the risk of the specific use case, set to measurable benchmarks, and ensure safe and ethical practices to promote continued innovation while also protecting intellectual property, trade secrets, and security. Any transparency, explainability, or audit requirements imposed on AI systems must account for protecting personal information, and carefully balance the proprietary and trade secret protections regarding the AI system and the technical feasibility of implementing such requirements. It must also not jeopardize the safety systems of AI-driven services.AI Verified source (2025)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses mandating independent third-party audits of AI systems and argues such mandates are premature, which clearly covers the policy of requiring third-party audits for major AI systems.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes a mandate now, saying it is "premature to mandate independent third-party auditing of AI systems" and warning that mandating audits could create security and trade secret risks.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified on TechNet’s official “2025 Federal Policy Principles” PDF: the first paragraph appears in the AI “External Reviews” section and matches the quoted wording, and the second paragraph appears in the “Responsible AI Evaluations” section with the same 2025 wording (“protecting personal information, and carefully balance...” / “not jeopardize the safety systems of AI-driven services”). The quote is therefore authentic and attributable to TechNet. The supplied URL is a later TechNet AI policy page dated January 22, 2026; it includes the first paragraph but revises the second paragraph to say “safety, cybersecurity, and anti-fraud systems,” so the exact quote is confirmed from the 2025 official TechNet PDF rather than that page. ([technet.org](https://www.technet.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025-TechNet-Federal-Policy-Principles.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified: This is from TechNet's federal AI policy position page at technet.org. The URL returned 403 to WebFetch, but web search confirms the exact text and TechNet's authorship of these specific paragraphs about why third-party AI audits are "premature" and the national security/trade secrets concerns. Year 2025 is plausible for this current policy page. The vote "against" on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" aligns perfectly - TechNet explicitly argues such mandates are premature.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to TechNet