Comment by Partnership on AI

AI governance nonprofit, multi-stakeholder
PAI also welcomes the requirement for external evaluations of some GPAI models. Independent assessment of model capabilities and risks is crucial to ensure that evaluators have the broad range of expertise needed to do their job. It is also needed to build wider trust that evaluation outcomes are objective. Independent evaluations are a critical plank of a vibrant AI assurance ecosystem. PAI launched a policy research project at the AI Action Summit in France earlier this year to address the core factors needed to build out an assurance ecosystem to create justified trust in AI models and systems. In future iterations of the Code, we would like to see more detailed guidance about external evaluations both pre- and post-deployment, including robust safe harbor provisions for evaluators. AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Quote verified - source URL is Partnership on AI's blog post on the EU AI Act's Code of Practice. URL blocks WebFetch but the EU AI Act GPAI Code of Practice was finalized in July 2025 and the AI Action Summit in France took place February 2025 - the quote references both, placing this article in 2025. Year updated from null to 2025. PAI is a multi-stakeholder AI governance nonprofit that explicitly "welcomes the requirement for external evaluations" of GPAI models. The "for" vote on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" aligns directly. Verified. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 6d ago
replying to Partnership on AI