YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Mustafa Suleyman

Avatar
Microsoft AI CEO; author
So, an intergovernmental panel on A.I. would be one that has access to all of the largest commercial labs and academic labs all around the world developing these large language models. They would be able to probe them and test them, audit them, look at what data they are, you know, using to do training and try to find weaknesses and failure modes in the models. Once they discover those, they should then be able to share those with other national or international commercial competitors in order to improve the quality and performance of those models. But the first step is really just understanding and auditing and establishing the fact pattern of what are the boundaries that these models can’t cross today and what — where are they headed in the future.
AI Verified source (Aug 16, 2023)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports external auditing of major AI models: the author proposes an intergovernmental panel with access to the largest labs that can 'probe them and test them, audit them' and says 'the first step is really just understanding and auditing.' That directly implies support for third-party audits of major AI systems. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports outside oversight: an "intergovernmental panel on A.I." should have "access to all of the largest commercial labs" and be able to "probe them and test them, audit them." That is clear support for third-party audits, though it does not dwell on the legal mechanism beyond giving the panel access. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified PBS’s 2023-08-16 Amanpour & Company page at the supplied URL reproduces this passage under “SULEYMAN,” and CNN’s transcript of the same segment matches it essentially verbatim, including the closing “what -- where are they headed in the future.” The stored author, date, content, and source URL are consistent with the evidence. ([pbs.org](https://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/ian-bremmer-and-mustafa-suleyman-on-the-race-to-regulate-ai/?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Disputed Disputed: the PBS source is the August 16, 2023 Amanpour interview with Bremmer and Suleyman, and the corresponding transcript shows the first paragraph verbatim from Suleyman, ending at “where are they headed in the future”; the very next line is Isaacson’s follow-up question, not the added “In short, we need...” paragraph. I found no reliable source for that added IAEA sentence; the only matching hit was an aggregator labeling the source “Unverified.” ([pbs.org](https://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/ian-bremmer-and-mustafa-suleyman-on-the-race-to-regulate-ai/?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Unverifiable The source URL (PBS Amanpour & Company video page) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden when accessed via WebFetch, so I cannot programmatically verify the exact wording on the primary source. The quote content (advocating an IPCC/IAEA-style intergovernmental panel for AI auditing and oversight) aligns with Mustafa Suleyman's well-documented public positions co-authored with Ian Bremmer (e.g., Foreign Affairs 2023, IMF F&D Dec 2023) and matches his consistent messaging through 2025-2026. Vote alignment ('for' on statement #360 'Establish a UN-led body to oversee compute-intensive AI') is correct given the quote's content. Year (2023) matches the PBS interview timeframe. Not able to confirm verbatim text due to 403 on source URL. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Mustafa Suleyman