Comment by Ursula von der Leyen

First of all, let’s not forget that A.I. is a tremendous opportunity — if used responsibly. But responsibility at the frontier cannot be left to chance or to any single company or country. Just as the world built institutions to govern nuclear power — with the IAEA at the core of a U.N. framework — we should work with partners on a global architecture for A.I. that can set clear rules for the most compute-intensive systems, assess risks, and verify compliance. That means independent testing, shared scientific expertise, and an international authority that can see across borders. Europe will do its part. But only a U.N.-anchored, IAEA‑like approach for the highest‑risk A.I. can give citizens everywhere the confidence that this technology will be safe and trustworthy. AI Unverifiable source (2024)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (weforum.org Davos 2024 speech) returns HTTP 403, as does the EC press corner mirror. Search results confirm von der Leyen has publicly compared AI governance to the IAEA model and Europe's role in shaping international AI rules, and her Davos 2024 speech did discuss responsible AI. However, the exact wording in this quote (specific phrasing about 'U.N.-anchored, IAEA-like approach' and 'compute-intensive systems') could not be located verbatim in publicly indexed coverage of the Davos 2024 speech — and reports of that speech emphasize EU AI Act and supercomputers rather than verbatim IAEA framing. Vote 'for' on statement #360 aligns with the substantive position. Marking unverifiable because source URL is blocked and I cannot confirm verbatim text. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 5d ago
replying to Ursula von der Leyen