Comment by Madison Cutler

Predictive policing programs utilize algorithms to allocate law enforcement resources to areas and persons identified as having a higher risk for crime, despite a lack of evidence showing the efficacy of these determinations. Commercially-produced and in-house predictive policing software varies greatly in design and is not subject to standardization or government accountability. Predictive policing programs rely on biased historical data, threaten the civil rights of community members, and do not provide for transparency or accountability regarding their practices. For these reasons, predictive policing tools should not be used in any law enforcement agency. If agencies are using these tools, they must be subject to frequent evaluation and practice transparency regarding data. AI Verified source (2024)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search. The policy brief "Development of and Concerns Regarding Predictive Policing Practices" by Madison Cutler (BA '24) was published by Ford School STPP on June 24, 2024 - confirmed by multiple sources including the deepblue.lib.umich.edu repository. The brief's documented content (concerns about biased historical data, civil rights violations, lack of transparency/accountability, no evidence of efficacy) directly matches the quote. Source URL returned 403 to me but authorship and content are independently confirmed. Vote "for" correctly aligns with statement "Ban predictive policing" - the brief recommends predictive policing tools "should not be used in any law enforcement agency." · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 4d ago
replying to Madison Cutler