Comment by Lindsey Barrett

This article will argue that the use of predictive policing algorithms at the border should not be barred outright, as the government should permit potentially beneficial uses of the technology to develop. However, use of these algorithms should be carefully limited by statute to prevent the wholesale trammeling of privacy and civil liberties. This article argues that the use of predictive policing programs should be limited, but not banned, in the border context. [...] Predictive policing cannot and should not be implemented without rigorous safeguards, but neither should its potential to improve law enforcement methods go wholly ignored. AI Unverifiable source (2017)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable The source URL (socialchangenyu.com) returned HTTP 403 Forbidden and could not be fetched. However, the quote is independently confirmed via web search results which paraphrase Barrett's article "Reasonably Suspicious Algorithms: Predictive Policing at the United States Border" (NYU Review of Law & Social Change, 2017), using language verbatim from the quote: "use of predictive policing algorithms at the border should not be barred outright, so as to permit potentially beneficial uses of the technology to develop, it should be carefully limited by statute to prevent the wholesale trammeling of privacy and civil liberties." Vote alignment is correct (against "Ban predictive policing" - Barrett explicitly argues it should be limited but not banned). Marking ai_unverifiable since the source URL blocks AI fetching. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 3d ago
replying to Lindsey Barrett