Comment by L Rudolf L

I’ve heard many people say something like “money won’t matter post-AGI”. This has always struck me as odd, and as most likely completely incorrect. First: labour means human mental and physical effort that produces something of value. Capital goods are things like factories, data centres, and software—things humans have built that are used in the production of goods and services. The key economic effect of AI is that it makes capital a more and more general substitute for labour. There’s less need to pay humans for their time to perform work, because you can replace that with capital (e.g. data centres running software replaces a human doing mental labour). Overall, this points to a neglected downside of transformative AI: that society might become permanently static, and that current power imbalances might be amplified and then turned immutable. AI Unverifiable source (2024)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable The source URL (forum.effectivealtruism.org) returned HTTP 403 Forbidden and the LessWrong mirror returned a TLS certificate error. However, the quote content is confirmed via web search results from the same post "By default, capital will matter more than ever after AGI" by L Rudolf L (late 2024) on EA Forum/LessWrong, which describes the key economic effect of AI as making capital a substitute for labour, and warns about society becoming permanently static. Vote alignment is correct (against "AGI will create abundance" - the author argues abundance would NOT be broadly distributed because capital owners would dominate). Marking ai_unverifiable since the source URLs are inaccessible to AI fetching. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 3d ago
replying to L Rudolf L