We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ben Southwood
AI economist and commentator
Because post-superintelligence abundance will be so great, agreements to share power and benefits should strongly be in the leader’s national self-interest: as we noted in the section on abundance, having only 80% of a very large pie is much more desirable than an 80% chance of the whole pie and 20% chance of nothing. Of course, making such commitments credible is very challenging, but this is something that AI itself could help with. Slowing the intelligence explosion. If we could slow down the intelligence explosion in general, that would give decision-makers and institutions more time to react thoughtfully. One route to prevent chaotically fast progress is for the leading power (like the US and allies) to build a strong lead, allowing it to comfortably use stabilising measures over the period of fastest change.Disputed source (2024)
8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes For
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
Disputed: the cited sentences do appear in the original Forethought paper "Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion," but the stored quote is not verbatim. In the source, "Slowing the intelligence explosion..." comes first, then the "One route to prevent chaotically fast progress..." sentence, and only then the "Because post-superintelligence abundance..." paragraph; the stored version reorders those passages and omits intervening text without [...]. The canonical source is the co-authored Forethought paper by William MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse, published 2025-03-11, not a 2024 single-author Ben Southwood source. The supplied EA Forum URL is a linkpost/comments page rather than the canonical original source. Because the original source has multiple individual authors, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote. ([forethought.org](https://www.forethought.org/preparing-for-the-intelligence-explosion))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Disputed
The passage is real and verbatim, but I could not verify the claimed attribution. I found the text in Forethought’s “Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion,” authored by William MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse and dated March 11, 2025; the wording matches in both the webpage and PDF. ([forethought.org](https://www.forethought.org/research/preparing-for-the-intelligence-explosion?reloaded=true)) The supplied EA Forum URL is also a March 11, 2025 linkpost by finm/William_MacAskill/Forethought, and the quoted text appears there as a quotation in comments, not as a 2024 Ben Southwood source; I found no reliable source attributing this wording to Ben Southwood. ([forum.effectivealtruism.org](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/boWLMTtv6BZGAWjrS/preparing-for-the-intelligence-explosion))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
Disputed
The quote text is genuine and from the source URL paper, but the author attribution is incorrect. The paper "Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion" was authored by William MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse (published March 11, 2025 via Forethought), not by Ben Southwood. While Ben Southwood is also affiliated with Forethought and writes on AI/economics, he is not a listed author of this specific paper per Forethought's official byline. The quote text matches the paper, and the vote alignment (for "AGI will create abundance") is consistent with the paper's framing. Year should also be 2025, not 2024. Marking as disputed due to misattribution.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Ben Southwood