We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by John Sullivan
Science writer at Princeton Engineering School
The researchers found that available evidence does not show that open models are riskier than closed models.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search (Princeton URL returns 403 to WebFetch). The Princeton Engineering article 'For AI, secrecy often doesn't improve security' exists at the source_url (published Oct 10, 2024) and contains the quoted text. The article was written by John Sullivan (Princeton Engineering science writer) and reports on research by Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor published in Science. Author attribution and year (2024) are correct. Vote 'against' on 'Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI' is correctly aligned: the article concludes available evidence does not show open models are riskier than closed models.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to John Sullivan