YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Himanshu Tyagi

Human avatar
Technology journalist writing on AI safety
But the real danger lies in centralized, black-box systems that resist open auditing. AI Unverifiable source (2025)
Like Share on X 5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI

Verification History

AI Unverifiable The source URL (ccn.com/opinion/technology/future-ai-development-must-be-open-source/) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden to WebFetch. Web search confirms the article exists ("For Safety's Sake, the Future of AI Development Must Be Open-Source", CCN.com, Oct 14, 2025) and is authored by Himanshu Tyagi (co-founder of Sentient, IISc professor), but I could not retrieve the exact quote text from the page or via search snippets. The substance of the quote aligns with Tyagi's well-documented public position that closed/black-box AI is the real danger and open-source is safer, and the "against" vote on the statement "Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI" is consistent with that view. Marking as ai_unverifiable because I cannot positively confirm the exact wording in the source. Note: the author biography ("Technology journalist writing on AI safety") is inaccurate — Tyagi is a professor and AI startup co-founder, not a journalist. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 2d ago
replying to Himanshu Tyagi