YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Kyle Miller

Human avatar
Research analyst at Georgetown's CSET think tank
Nefarious actors can use open models maliciously, [...] whereas developers of closed models have more means to identify and disrupt this malicious use.
AI Verified source (2024)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote compares open and closed models on overall misuse risk: it says open models can be used maliciously, while closed-model developers have more ability to detect and stop such misuse. That clearly implies the author views open-source AI as more dangerous than closed-source AI. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote says open models can be used maliciously and closed-model developers have "more means to identify and disrupt" that misuse, but it does not explicitly say open-source AI is overall "more dangerous" than closed-source AI. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The source URL leads to CSET’s article "Open Foundation Models: Implications of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence," which lists Kyle Miller as the author and is dated March 12, 2024. In lines 195-196, it contains the same sentence beginning "Nefarious actors can use open models maliciously" and ending "identify and disrupt this malicious use." Your version uses [...] to omit the middle examples of misuse, so it is a faithful ellipsis omission and is correctly attributed. ([cset.georgetown.edu](https://cset.georgetown.edu/article/open-foundation-models-implications-of-contemporary-artificial-intelligence)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Verified via web search. Kyle Miller is a Research Analyst at Georgetown's CSET, and is an author/contributor on the CSET piece "Open Foundation Models: Implications of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence". Search results confirm Miller's framing about nefarious actors accessing open models while developers of closed models have more means to identify/disrupt malicious use. The "abstain" vote on "Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI" is appropriate given Miller's nuanced position — he describes the safety risk asymmetry but the broader CSET piece calls for empirical research rather than taking a definitive side. CSET URL returned 403 on direct fetch; verification relies on search snippets that match the quote's content. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Kyle Miller