We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Kyle Miller
Research analyst at Georgetown's CSET think tank
Nefarious actors can use open models maliciously, [...] whereas developers of closed models have more means to identify and disrupt this malicious use.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. Kyle Miller is a Research Analyst at Georgetown's CSET, and is an author/contributor on the CSET piece "Open Foundation Models: Implications of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence". Search results confirm Miller's framing about nefarious actors accessing open models while developers of closed models have more means to identify/disrupt malicious use. The "abstain" vote on "Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI" is appropriate given Miller's nuanced position — he describes the safety risk asymmetry but the broader CSET piece calls for empirical research rather than taking a definitive side. CSET URL returned 403 on direct fetch; verification relies on search snippets that match the quote's content.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to Kyle Miller