Comment by Steven Hill

Political author and policy analyst
Given the constraints on the current research paradigm, scientists and policy advocates are increasingly coming to the conclusion that a more collaborative and international endeavor is necessary to truly harness the power of AI and ensure it is used for beneficial purposes. In June 2017, representatives from the World Health Organization and a number of other United Nations agencies were joined by AI experts, policy makers and business leaders in Geneva, Switzerland, for a three-day summit called “AI for Good.” The goal was to provide a forum for a nonpartisan and noncommercial evaluation of the possibilities AI offers to benefit all of humanity. The participants discussed how AI research could focus on developments that would help everyone – from reducing inequality and improving the environment to building services for emerging countries, where people increasingly have access to smart phones. Facebook, for example, reaches nearly 800 million users in the developing world, where the company has tailored its app for low-bandwidth connections and less expensive Android phones. “This is where AI can learn from other disciplines,” says Slusallek. “For example, the Human Genome project has brought researchers from around the globe together to jointly and systematically study human genomics. As a result, we have made huge progress in just a few years that would have been impossible without these coordinated efforts.” Marcus echoes that observation, going so far as to propose the creation of a CERN for AI. CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is one of the world’s largest and most respected centers for high-intensity physics and particle acceleration. It is a huge, international collaboration, with thousands of scientists and billions of dollars in funding provided by dozens of nations. Following that model, some scientists and experts like Marcus are calling for an international consortium that is focused on pure AI science and research to serve the public good. This would be a highly interdisciplinary effort that would bring together scientists from many areas, in close collaboration and interaction with industry, politics and the public. A key element would be advancing the many strands of research in this area by discussing common approaches, methods, algorithms, data and their applications. [...] Instead of a race to AI supremacy, a CERN for AI could produce research and basic architecture development that would be made publicly available so that more nations and their populations could benefit from it. The world can engage in a cooperative, international effort to develop these powerful AI technologies for humanity, or we can have a trade war – or, even worse, an arms race. A resurgence of internationalism focused on AI could be just what the world needs.
AI Verified source (2018)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly proposes “the creation of a CERN for AI” and describes “an international consortium” for AI research modeled on CERN, which directly matches creating a global AI institute similar to CERN. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history No vote Report this
No vote to verify yet.
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly implies opposition to restricting a CERN for AI to EU member states: it repeatedly calls for an "international consortium," says AI needs a "cooperative, international effort," cites CERN as funded by "dozens of nations," and says "more nations" should benefit. That conflicts with an EU-only restriction. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote calls for "a more collaborative and international endeavor," "an international consortium," and says "more nations and their populations could benefit" from a "cooperative, international effort," which opposes limiting it to only EU member states. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the supplied URL redirects to the May 22, 2018 article "Opinion Piece: Why we need a CERN for AI," credited to Steven Hill. The quoted passage appears there essentially verbatim: the beginning matches lines 65–71, the ending matches lines 75–76, and the [...] is a faithful omission of intervening sentences rather than an alteration of the quoted wording. ([reframetech.de](https://www.reframetech.de/en/2018/05/22/opinion-piece-why-we-need-a-cern-for-ai/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is an excerpt from Steven Hill's 2018 article "Why we need a CERN for AI", which appears on his personal site (steven-hill.com) and was syndicated to reframetech.de. The biography "Political author and policy analyst" matches Hill (former New America fellow, author of multiple books on tech/policy). The article explicitly supports creating a CERN-style AI consortium, citing Gary Marcus's original proposal and the Human Genome Project as a comparable cooperative model. The "for" vote on "Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN" is fully consistent. Note: the year (2018) is older than 2025/2026, and I could not find a more recent Steven Hill quote on this specific topic to substitute. Source URL returned 403; verification relies on corroborating search results pointing to the original article on Hill's site and reframetech.de. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Steven Hill