Comment by Machine Intelligence Research Institute

Suppose that frontier AI development is centralized to a single project under tight international controls, with all other development banned internationally. By far the likeliest outcome of this is that we all die. A centralized group of international researchers — a “CERN for AI” — can’t align superintelligence any more than decentralized organizations can. Centralization at least has the advantage that it makes it easier to shut the remaining research down; but this advantage only helps if key decision-makers actually shut down. Rather than advocating for centralization in the hope of getting an effective moratorium, it makes far more sense to just advocate for a moratorium directly.
Disputed source (2025)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The passage appears verbatim at the provided URL in the article "A Note on AI for Medicine and Biotech." The page shows publication date September 15, 2025 and credits two individual authors, Nate Soares and Eliezer Yudkowsky, not the Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Because this is a multi-author byline rather than an organization speaking alone, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote; the attribution is therefore disputed. ([intelligence.org](https://intelligence.org/2025/09/15/a-note-on-ai-for-medicine/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Disputed The passage is real and appears verbatim at the cited URL on September 15, 2025, but that page attributes the article to "Nate Soares and Eliezer Yudkowsky," not to Machine Intelligence Research Institute. MIRI is the publishing organization/site, not the credited author on the source page, so the quote is misattributed as presented. ([intelligence.org](https://intelligence.org/2025/09/15/a-note-on-ai-for-medicine/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Unverifiable Source URL (intelligence.org) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden for WebFetch — MIRI's domain blocks AI scrapers. Could not directly verify the quote text against the source. However: (1) the views expressed (centralization can't align superintelligence, advocate moratorium directly, "we all die" as likeliest outcome) are entirely consistent with MIRI's well-documented public position from Yudkowsky/Soares ("If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies") and their AI Governance to Avoid Extinction work; (2) the vote "against" on "Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN" correctly reflects the quote's clear opposition to a CERN-for-AI model. Marking ai_unverifiable due to source access blocking, not due to suspicion of inaccuracy. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Machine Intelligence Research Institute