Comment by Machine Intelligence Research Institute

Suppose that frontier AI development is centralized to a single project under tight international controls, with all other development banned internationally. By far the likeliest outcome of this is that we all die. A centralized group of international researchers — a “CERN for AI” — can’t align superintelligence any more than decentralized organizations can. Centralization at least has the advantage that it makes it easier to shut the remaining research down; but this advantage only helps if key decision-makers actually shut down. Rather than advocating for centralization in the hope of getting an effective moratorium, it makes far more sense to just advocate for a moratorium directly. AI Unverifiable source (2025)
Like Share on X 5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (intelligence.org) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden for WebFetch — MIRI's domain blocks AI scrapers. Could not directly verify the quote text against the source. However: (1) the views expressed (centralization can't align superintelligence, advocate moratorium directly, "we all die" as likeliest outcome) are entirely consistent with MIRI's well-documented public position from Yudkowsky/Soares ("If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies") and their AI Governance to Avoid Extinction work; (2) the vote "against" on "Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN" correctly reflects the quote's clear opposition to a CERN-for-AI model. Marking ai_unverifiable due to source access blocking, not due to suspicion of inaccuracy. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 2d ago
replying to Machine Intelligence Research Institute