We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by California State Legislature
State legislative body
(e) (1) Beginning January 1, 2026, a developer of a covered model shall annually retain a third-party auditor that conducts audits consistent with best practices for auditors to perform an independent audit of compliance with the requirements of this section.
(3) The auditor shall be granted access to unredacted materials as necessary to comply with the auditor’s obligations under this subdivision.
(4) The auditor shall produce an audit report including all of the following:
(A) A detailed assessment of the developer’s steps to comply with the requirements of this section.
(B) If applicable, any identified instances of noncompliance with the requirements of this section, and any recommendations for how the developer can improve its policies and processes for ensuring compliance with the requirements of this section.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. legiscan URL returned 403 but web search results confirm the exact text appears verbatim in California SB 1047 (Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Models Act, 2023-2024 session). The passage about "Beginning January 1, 2026, a developer of a covered model shall annually retain a third-party auditor...", access to unredacted materials, and the audit report containing a detailed compliance assessment plus noncompliance findings/recommendations matches the bill text word-for-word. Year 2024 correct (bill text from the 2023-24 session; it was ultimately vetoed by Newsom on 9/29/2024, but the attributable legislative author is the CA State Legislature which passed it). Vote "for" on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" is exactly what the bill provision does.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to California State Legislature