We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Jake Laperruque
Center for Democracy & Technology deputy director
Principles for responsible use of AI technologies should be applied broadly across development and deployment. In particular, Government use of AI should be:
(1) Built upon proper training data;
(2) Subject to independent testing and high performance standards;
(3) Deployed only within the bounds of the technology's designed function;
(4) Used exclusively by trained staff and corroborated by human review;
(5) Subject to internal governance mechanisms that define and promote responsible use;
(6) Bound by safeguards to protect human rights and Constitutional values; and
(7) Regulated by institutional mechanisms for ensuring transparency and oversight.
Independent Testing.--Requiring independent testing and high performance standards is a key safeguard against adoption of low-quality systems. Such measures are important because poor algorithm design or flawed training data are not always readily apparent, and AI technologies are frequently being applied to new situations and circumstances. Testing should be conducted by independent experts, with transparent methodology that allows for peer review and improvement.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via contextual evidence. congress.gov URL returned 403 but web search confirms: (1) Jake Laperruque, Deputy Director at Center for Democracy & Technology (matches biography), testified before the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee on May 22, 2024 (year correct) at the hearing "Advancing Innovation (AI): Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Defend and Secure the Homeland" — which is CHRG-118hhrg58784 (the cited URL); (2) CDT's summary of his testimony describes "key principles for responsible AI use" — matching the structure of the quoted seven principles; (3) themes around training data quality, independent testing, transparency and oversight, human review, and Constitutional safeguards are consistent with CDT/Laperruque's published positions. Exact verbatim text not found in indexed snippets (PDF content not surfaced) but author, venue, date, and substantive themes all confirm authenticity. Vote "for" on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" aligns directly with principle (2) of the testimony.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to Jake Laperruque