We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Scott Robbins
AI ethics researcher
[...] principles requiring that AI be explicable are misguided.
We should be deciding which decisions require explanations.
Automation is still an option;
AI Verified
source
(2019)
4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote is from Scott Robbins's 2019 paper "A Misdirected Principle with a Catch: Explicability for AI" in Minds and Machines (29:495-514). Source URL is the official Springer publication. Source returned 403 to direct fetch but is well-documented across PhilPapers, Semantic Scholar, and TU Delft. Robbins's core argument is that requiring explicability of AI as a principle is misdirected — explicability should attach to specific decisions/contexts, not to AI as a category. Vote "against" the statement "Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable" aligns precisely with his published thesis. Quote is older (2019) but represents Robbins's foundational and still-cited academic position on the topic.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1d ago
replying to Scott Robbins