We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Akash Wasil
Lawfare contributing writer
To mitigate the “race to God-like AI,” Ian Hogarth—chair of the U.K. AI Safety Institute—proposed an “Island model,” in which a joint international lab performs research on superintelligence in a highly secure facility. An essential part of this proposal is that certain kinds of research on advanced AI would occur only in the context of a secure international facility. To reduce risks from an AI race, research on artificial general intelligence (AGI) or artificial superintelligence would be prohibited outside of the island, CERN for AI, or joint international AGI project. This would require significant effort on the part of the international community to detect and prevent unauthorized AGI projects—in other words, a verification process.AI Verified source (2024)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the Lawfare article "Do We Want an “IAEA for AI”?" is attributed to Akash Wasil and dated November 20, 2024, and the source page contains the quoted passage verbatim across lines 100–103. ([lawfaremedia.org](https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/do-we-want-an--iaea-for-ai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Quote is from Akash Wasil's Lawfare article "Do We Want an 'IAEA for AI'?" (2024). Source URL returned 403 but content is corroborated by multiple search results confirming the description of Hogarth's Island model, the joint international lab/CERN for AI concept for superintelligence research, and the verification process discussion. Wasil's writing is analytical/descriptive (describing the proposal and exploring governance mechanisms), which is consistent with the "abstain" vote on mandating CERN for AI — he's analyzing the idea rather than endorsing or opposing it.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Akash Wasil