We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Toby Walsh
Scientia Professor of Artificial Intelligence
Some tech leaders think AI could outsmart us and wipe out humanity. I’m a professor of AI – and I’m not worried.AI Verified source (2025)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses the claim that AI could 'wipe out humanity,' which matches an existential threat to humanity, and the author clearly rejects that concern by saying 'I’m not worried.'
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The author contrasts others who think AI could "wipe out humanity" with "I’m a professor of AI – and I’m not worried," indicating they do not share the view that AI is an existential threat.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The UNSW source URL contains the article title "Friday essay: some tech leaders think AI could outsmart us and wipe out humanity. I’m a professor of AI – and I’m not worried" and credits the piece to Toby Walsh. The quoted two-sentence text matches the title’s substantive wording; the source adds the prefatory label "Friday essay:" before it. A secondary mirror also shows the same title with byline "By Toby Walsh, Professor of AI, Research Group Leader, UNSW Sydney" and dates it to February 13, 2025. ([unsw.edu.au](https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2025/02/some-tech-leaders-think-ai-could-outsmart-us-professor-of-ai-not-worried))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote is the title/opening of Toby Walsh's February 2025 essay at UNSW Newsroom. The UNSW URL returned 403 to WebFetch but the article and its title are confirmed via search results and secondary coverage (ACS Information Age, Newington College). Toby Walsh is indeed Scientia Professor of AI at UNSW Sydney. His position is clearly against the existential-threat claim, so the vote 'against' the statement 'AI poses an existential threat to humanity' aligns correctly.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Toby Walsh