We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Ramez Naam
Science author and futurist
We can see this more directly. There are already entities with vastly greater than human intelligence working on the problem of augmenting their own intelligence. A great many, in fact. We call them corporations. And while we may have a variety of thoughts about them, not one has achieved transcendence.
Let’s focus on as a very particular example: The Intel Corporation. Intel is my favorite example because it uses the collective brainpower of tens of thousands of humans and probably millions of CPU cores to.. design better CPUs! (And also to create better software for designing CPUs.) Those better CPUs will run the better software to make the better next generation of CPUs.
Yet that feedback loop has not led to a hard takeoff scenario. It has helped drive Moore’s Law, which is impressive enough. But the time period for doublings seems to have remained roughly constant. Again, let’s not underestimate how awesome that is. But it’s not a sudden transcendence scenario. It’s neither a FOOM nor an event horizon.
AI Verified
source
(2015)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote is from Ramez Naam's May 12, 2015 essay "The Singularity is Further Than it Appears" on rameznaam.com. The URL returned 403 to WebFetch but the content is confirmed via search results and reprints (ieet.org, antipope.org/charlie). The Intel Corporation example and FOOM/hard-takeoff argument are central to Naam's well-documented anti-rapid-takeoff position. The vote 'against' the statement 'AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence' aligns correctly with Naam's argument that recursive self-improvement (as exemplified by Intel) has not produced a hard takeoff scenario.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 23d ago
replying to Ramez Naam