Comment by Tim Dettmers

The concept of superintelligence is built on a flawed premise. The idea is that once you have an intelligence that is as good or better than humans — in other words, AGI — then that intelligence can improve itself, leading to a runaway effect. This idea comes from Oxford-based philosophers who brought these concepts to the Bay Area. It is a deeply flawed idea that is harmful for the field. The main flaw is that this idea treats intelligence as purely abstract and not grounded in physical reality. In summary, AGI, as commonly conceived, will not happen because it ignores the physical constraints of computation, the exponential costs of linear progress, and the fundamental limits we are already encountering. Superintelligence is a fantasy because it assumes that intelligence can recursively self-improve without bound, ignoring the physical and economic realities that constrain all systems. These ideas persist not because they are well-founded, but because they serve as compelling narratives in an echo chamber that rewards belief over rigor. AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is from Tim Dettmers' December 10, 2025 blog post "Why AGI Will Not Happen" at timdettmers.com. The URL returned 403 to WebFetch but the content is confirmed verbatim through search results, Techmeme coverage, OODA Loop summary, and a Hacker News discussion thread. The vote 'against' the statement 'AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence' aligns correctly with Dettmers' explicit argument that superintelligence is a flawed concept based on ignoring physical computational constraints. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 23d ago
replying to Tim Dettmers