Comment by John Villasenor

UCLA professor; Brookings senior fellow
If it turns out that [...] renders the product harmful, the company needs to bear responsibility for that as well.
AI Verified source (Oct 31, 2019)
Like Share on X 4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote is directly about whether AI companies must bear responsibility when a deployed AI product evolves and becomes harmful. In context, the article says companies "need to bear responsibility for the AI products they create" and "should generally not be able to escape liability" by blaming post-sale AI evolution, so this quote provides a clear determinable stance on company liability for harms caused by deployed models. ([brookings.edu](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/products-liability-law-as-a-way-to-address-ai-harms/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote directly says that if an AI system's post-sale evolution 'renders the product harmful,' 'the company needs to bear responsibility for that as well.' In context, the article argues companies should not escape liability by blaming AI-driven changes in deployed systems, which strongly supports the statement. ([brookings.edu](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/products-liability-law-as-a-way-to-address-ai-harms/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Brookings’ article “Products liability law as a way to address AI harms” is credited to John Villasenor and dated October 31, 2019; it contains the full sentence from which the submitted wording is a faithful excerpt with omitted middle text (“[...]”). The source URL, author, and date all match. ([brookings.edu](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/products-liability-law-as-a-way-to-address-ai-harms/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 2d ago
replying to John Villasenor