We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David Evan Harris
UC Berkeley public scholar, tech policy advisor
Hold developers of AI systems legally liable for harms caused by their systems, including harms to individuals and harms to society.AI Verified source (Dec 4, 2023)
4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Directly on point: the quote explicitly calls for holding AI developers legally liable for harms caused by their systems, and the source summary likewise says developers and deployers should be held liable. That makes a determinate stance on the complete statement substantially more likely. ([techpolicy.press](https://www.techpolicy.press/how-to-regulate-unsecured-opensource-ai-no-exemptions/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The author explicitly endorses liability: the article recommends to “Hold developers of AI systems legally liable for harms caused by their systems,” which directly supports holding AI companies liable for harms from deployed models. ([techpolicy.press](https://www.techpolicy.press/how-to-regulate-unsecured-opensource-ai-no-exemptions/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The source URL contains the exact sentence verbatim: "Hold developers of AI systems legally liable for harms caused by their systems, including harms to individuals and harms to society." It appears in the TechPolicy.Press article "How to Regulate Unsecured “Open-Source” AI: No Exemptions," which is attributed on the page to David Evan Harris and dated Dec 4, 2023. The stored author, date, quote text, and source URL match the source.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2d ago
replying to David Evan Harris