Comment by Ramayya Krishnan

Model developers need to document the rights they have to work with the data they are using to train the model. This documentation should also provide information about the source of the data, whether it was public or private, etc. Model developers should respect the right of data owners to opt out of data crawling (robots.txt file) and also provide data owners the opportunity to opt out of the use of their already collected data in model training or tuning. Model developers need to document the standards that were used in bias assessment and demonstrate the analysis that was conducted to assess structural bias in the data. Congress should require standardized documentation and, like audited financial statements, they should be verifiable by a trusted third party (e.g., an auditor).
Disputed source (2024)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

Disputed The passage is real and appears verbatim in Ramayya Krishnan’s prepared testimony for the Senate hearing The Need for Transparency in Artificial Intelligence: Congress.gov reproduces the same text in the prepared statement section, and the Senate Commerce testimony PDF shows it under Krishnan’s name. However, the supplied year is not supported by the cited source: the hearing date is September 12, 2023, and the GPO hearing transcript also identifies the hearing as held on September 12, 2023. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/senate-event/LC74132/text)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1d ago
replying to Ramayya Krishnan