Comment by The YouTube Team

That's why we're supporting the NO FAKES Act of 2025, [...] unauthorized digital replicas: AI-generated content simulating a person’s image or voice [...]
AI Verified source (Apr 9, 2025)
Like Share on X 4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly implies support for the statement: it says the author is "supporting the NO FAKES Act of 2025" and defines the issue as "unauthorized digital replicas" using AI to simulate a person’s image or voice. "Unauthorized" matches lack of consent, and supporting the act indicates support for banning that conduct. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says they are "supporting the NO FAKES Act of 2025" and targets "unauthorized digital replicas"—AI content simulating a person’s image or voice—so it clearly supports banning nonconsensual AI impersonation. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The provided YouTube Blog page is by The YouTube Team and dated Apr 09, 2025. It contains the exact substrings “That's why we're supporting the NO FAKES Act of 2025,” and “unauthorized digital replicas: AI-generated content simulating a person’s image or voice,” with only omitted intervening text, so the stored quote is authentic, correctly attributed, and present at the source URL. ([blog.youtube](https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/youtube-supports-the-no-fakes-act/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Disputed The official YouTube Blog post at the provided URL is by The YouTube Team and was published on April 9, 2025. It contains the relevant wording, but not exactly as quoted: it says, “That’s why we’re supporting the NO FAKES Act of 2025, introduced by Senator Chris Coons ...” and then, “... unauthorized digital replicas: AI-generated content simulating a person’s image or voice that can be used to mislead or misrepresent.” Because the submitted quote truncates the sentence after “voice” without marking that omission, it is not fully verbatim, even though it is from the correct source and author. ([blog.youtube](https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/youtube-supports-the-no-fakes-act/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
replying to The YouTube Team