We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by J. Kelsey
Writer, FreeDAO contributor
Our proposed model would randomly gather a Citizen Assembly as Guardians of a DAO from our existing Freeos participants — already well versed in democratic decision making on a weekly basis. The Guardians of this DAO (this proposal calls it CitAI DAO) would deliberate on AI policy decisions centred around a single AI policy question, and draft proposal(s) for potential answers and solutions. Draft proposal(s) would then go to the public, to gather sentiment and feedback. This sentiment and feedback data would be reviewed, and the Guardians of CitAI DAO would refine the proposal based on the feedback received.AI Verified source
4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports the idea: it proposes to "randomly gather a Citizen Assembly" to act as "Guardians" of a DAO focused on AI policy decisions. That is a direct endorsement of using sortition-like selection of citizens to staff an AI governance/oversight body.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 24d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote proposes to "randomly gather a Citizen Assembly as Guardians" to "deliberate on AI policy decisions," which clearly supports using sortition to staff an AI oversight body.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 24d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The supplied Medium page is the article "Implementing a Sortition-based DAO for Policymaking and AI Governance" by J. Kelsey, and lines 84–85 contain the quoted passage verbatim (with the final sentence continuing onto the next line). The page matches the provided URL. ([medium.com](https://medium.com/freedao/implementing-a-sortition-based-dao-for-ai-governance-2bc08413a733))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 25d ago
replying to J. Kelsey