Comment by J. Kelsey

Our proposed model would randomly gather a Citizen Assembly as Guardians of a DAO from our existing Freeos participants — already well versed in democratic decision making on a weekly basis. The Guardians of this DAO (this proposal calls it CitAI DAO) would deliberate on AI policy decisions centred around a single AI policy question, and draft proposal(s) for potential answers and solutions. Draft proposal(s) would then go to the public, to gather sentiment and feedback. This sentiment and feedback data would be reviewed, and the Guardians of CitAI DAO would refine the proposal based on the feedback received.
AI Verified source
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports the idea: it proposes to "randomly gather a Citizen Assembly" to act as "Guardians" of a DAO focused on AI policy decisions. That is a direct endorsement of using sortition-like selection of citizens to staff an AI governance/oversight body. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote proposes to "randomly gather a Citizen Assembly as Guardians" to "deliberate on AI policy decisions," which clearly supports using sortition to staff an AI oversight body. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified Verified. The supplied Medium page is the article "Implementing a Sortition-based DAO for Policymaking and AI Governance" by J. Kelsey, and lines 84–85 contain the quoted passage verbatim (with the final sentence continuing onto the next line). The page matches the provided URL. ([medium.com](https://medium.com/freedao/implementing-a-sortition-based-dao-for-ai-governance-2bc08413a733)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
replying to J. Kelsey