Comment by Electronic Frontier Foundation

We're a nonprofit that fights for your privacy and free speech online.
malicious deepfakes [...] the bill imposes criminal penalties [...] interfere in an election [...] The First Amendment generally bars criminal laws.
Disputed source (2019)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

Disputed The provided URL does contain the excerpted wording, and the page is dated June 24, 2019; however, the article is by Hayley Tsukayama, India McKinney, and Jamie Williams, not by Electronic Frontier Foundation as a single author. Because the source has multiple individual authors, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote record. ([eff.org](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/06/congress-should-not-rush-regulate-deepfakes)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Disputed The source URL does contain the quoted wording in substance: the article says "malicious deepfakes," then "the bill imposes criminal penalties" for conduct including "interfere in an election," and continues, "The First Amendment generally bars criminal laws" that impose penalties without showing harm. However, the page’s byline attributes the article to Hayley Tsukayama, India McKinney, and Jamie Williams—not to "Electronic Frontier Foundation" as the author—so this is present but misattributed. ([eff.org](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/06/congress-should-not-rush-regulate-deepfakes)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
replying to Electronic Frontier Foundation