We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
EU fundamental rights agency
Artificial intelligence (AI) brings about many opportunities for our societies and economies. But it also puts fundamental rights at risk, especially in sensitive areas like recruitment or social benefits. Drawing on interviews with providers, deployers and experts, a new report from the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) reveals that many in the field of high-risk AI systems do not know how to systematically assess or mitigate these risks. Strengthening awareness and rights-compliant implementation of the AI act is key to protecting people’s rights while enabling innovation and creating legal certainty for businesses. [...] Clear guidance for fundamental rights impact assessments: Clear and consistent guidance is needed to ensure that risk assessments for high-risk AI systems effectively protect all fundamental rights – going beyond the rights to privacy, data protection and non-discrimination. Identifying and mitigating fundamental rights risks will promote responsible innovation and support fair competition by helping providers create better and more trustworthy AI. Invest in a better understanding of risks and mitigation measures: The European Commission and EU countries should invest in studies and testing of AI systems, particularly in high-risk areas, for a better understanding of fundamental rights risks and effective mitigation practices. This would make the AI Act easier to implement. Ensure proper oversight: Self-assessments matter, but they only work when backed by independent oversight from well-resourced bodies with expertise in fundamental rights. The EU and its Member States should ensure that oversight authorities have sufficient funding, staff and technical support to effectively oversee the use of AI systems.AI Verified source (2025)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports creating evaluation procedures under the EU AI Act: it calls for 'clear and consistent guidance' for risk assessments, more 'studies and testing' of AI systems, and 'independent oversight' to make the AI Act easier to implement. That is a direct endorsement of establishing AI evaluation procedures.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports evaluation procedures, saying that "clear and consistent guidance is needed" for "risk assessments," calling for more "studies and testing of AI systems," and for oversight bodies to effectively oversee AI under the AI Act.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
The quote is authentic. FRA’s official 4 December 2025 press release, “FRA report calls for effective fundamental rights assessment of high-risk AI,” contains the opening paragraph verbatim, and the same official FRA page reproduces the three recommendation bullets (“Clear guidance...”, “Invest...”, and “Ensure proper oversight...”) with the same wording; your [...] omission only skips intervening text and flattens bullet formatting. Because this is organization-authored press-release text on FRA’s official site, the attribution to the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) is correct. ([fra.europa.eu](https://fra.europa.eu/es/news/2025/fra-report-calls-effective-fundamental-rights-assessment-high-risk-ai?utm_source=openai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
replying to European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)