We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by J. Kirk McGill.
Colorado attorney at Hall Estill
The government is not free to punish speech solely because it is false for the simple reason that a critical purpose of the First Amendment is to prevent the government from picking winners and losers, or truth and falsehoods, when it comes to speech [...] A deepfake video [...] is "at its core, simply a lie" [...]AI Verified source (2025-05-02)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly implies opposition to the policy: it argues the government cannot punish speech merely because it is false, and specifically treats a deepfake video as protected false speech. That directly conflicts with banning deceptive AI-generated media of election candidates, even though the quote does not name federal candidates explicitly.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote says "The government is not free to punish speech solely because it is false" and describes a deepfake as "simply a lie," which clearly points against prohibiting such media on that basis.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. Business Insider’s May 2, 2025 article contains both quoted passages and attributes them to Colorado attorney J. Kirk McGill of Hall Estill: the first sentence appears verbatim at line 194, and the second appears at line 196 (“A deepfake video … is ‘at its core, simply a lie’ …”). The stored author, date, source URL, and excerpt are consistent with the source; the ellipses only omit intervening words. ([businessinsider.com](https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-x-lawsuit-minnesota-deepfake-law-constitutional-problems-2025-5))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 3d ago
Disputed
Business Insider’s May 2, 2025 article does attribute both statements to J. Kirk McGill, but not in the form submitted. The article first gives McGill saying, “The government is not free to punish speech solely because it is false …,” and then separately says a deepfake video is “at its core, simply a lie.” Because the submitted quote reverses and splices two distinct passages, I cannot confirm it as verbatim as written. ([businessinsider.com](https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-x-lawsuit-minnesota-deepfake-law-constitutional-problems-2025-5))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source_url is the same Business Insider article (2025-05) that Claude Code is blocked from fetching; the dnyuz/yahoo syndications also return HTTP 403. Web search corroborated the key clause verbatim: J. Kirk McGill, a Colorado attorney (Hall Estill), said "The government is not free to punish speech solely because it is false..." regarding X's lawsuit against Minnesota's deepfake election law. Author attribution (McGill, Colorado attorney) and year (2025) are confirmed. The opening clause characterizing a deepfake video as "at its core, simply a lie" could not be confirmed verbatim via search but is consistent with his argument. Vote alignment is correct: McGill argues against criminalizing deepfakes on First Amendment grounds, so the "against" vote on "Criminalizing deepfakes and malicious use of AI in electoral campaigns" matches his stance. Marking ai_unverifiable because the source and its syndications block fetching.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 8d ago
replying to J. Kirk McGill.