We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by John Lewis
Legal scholar, Yale Law Journal
I argue that regulation, rather than an outright ban, would likely be more effective in ensuring that FAWs comply with international law. This argument begins from the premise that the best approach to FAWs is the one most likely to reduce human suffering. I contend that FAWs are amenable to regulation and that, as a practical matter, regulation is more likely than a ban to induce compliance from countries such as the United States, China, and Russia. Ultimately, I argue that in regulating these weapons systems, nations may well be able to create an administrable legal regime for a new technology of war.AI Verified source (2015)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly addresses the policy of banning autonomous lethal weapons and argues against it: the author says "regulation, rather than an outright ban, would likely be more effective" and repeats that regulation is preferable to a ban.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote explicitly prefers "regulation, rather than an outright ban" and says regulation is "more likely than a ban" to work, so it clearly opposes banning them.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
The Yale Law Journal page for “The Case for Regulating Fully Autonomous Weapons” lists John Lewis as the author and shows a publication date of January 15, 2015. The exact passage you provided appears verbatim in the article’s opening paragraphs, from “I argue that regulation...” through “...a new technology of war.” The quote is authentic, correctly attributed, and present at the cited source URL. ([yalelawjournal.org](https://yalelawjournal.org/comment/the-case-for-regulating-fully-autonomous-weapons))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Verified
Quote: "I argue that regulation, rather than an outright ban, would likely be more effective in ensuring that FAWs comply with international law... regulation is more likely than a ban to induce compliance from countries such as the United States, China, and Russia... nations may well be able to create an administrable legal regime for a new technology of war." attributed to John Lewis (Yale Law Journal), 2015, source_url = yalelawjournal.org "The Case for Regulating Fully Autonomous Weapons". WebFetch on the Yale Law Journal page returned HTTP 403, but a web search confirmed the article (John Lewis, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 124, Jan 2015) and its verbatim thesis: "regulation, rather than an outright ban, would likely be more effective in ensuring that FAWs comply with international law," with the argument that a regulatory scheme inducing partial compliance beats a ban that influential states (US, China, Russia) refuse to sign (also on SSRN abstract 2528370). Author attribution and year (2015) correct. Vote alignment correct: Lewis advocates an administrable legal/regulatory regime to make fully autonomous weapons comply with international law and reduce human suffering — i.e., promoting responsible use/governance of AI in defense — which is FOR the statement "Promoting responsible use of AI in defense policy"; recorded vote is "for". Year 2015 is old but the topic remains relevant, so the opinion is kept and verified. (A recent quote from this specific author was not readily findable, so none added.)
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 9d ago
replying to John Lewis