Comment by Patrick Breyer

Member of European Parliament, Pirate Party
„This proposal would justify the permanent and ubiquitious deployment of face surveillance to look for the thousands of ‚victims‘, ‚threats‘ and suspects of ‚serious crime‘ that are wanted at any time. We need to prevent a China-style dystopian future of biometric mass surveillance in Europe! This technology is being abused by authoritarian countries such as Russia or Iran, is this the direction our governments want to take us? With error rates (false positives) of up to 99%, ineffective facial surveillance technology bares no resemblance to the targeted search that proponents are trying to present it as. There is not a single example of real-time biometric surveillance preventing a terrorist attack, finding „missing children“ or other such events. We must stand up against biometric mass surveillance in our public spaces because these technologies wrongfully report large numbers of innocent citizens, systematically discriminate against under-represented groups and have a chilling effect on a free and diverse society. Legislation allowing for indiscriminate mass surveillance has consistently been annulled by the courts due to their incompatibility with fundamental rights. The European Parliament will need to fight to have this ban implemented in the AI Act!“
AI Verified source (2022)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly denounces biometric/face surveillance as "mass surveillance," warns against governments adopting it, and says a ban should be implemented in the AI Act. That clearly implies support for banning governments from using AI for mass surveillance of citizens. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly calls for stopping "biometric mass surveillance," saying "We need to prevent" it and that Parliament must "fight to have this ban implemented in the AI Act." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified Verified. The source URL is Patrick Breyer’s official website, dated 07 November 2022, and it introduces the passage with “Patrick Breyer, German Pirate Member of the European Parliament, warns ...” immediately before the block quote. The supplied text matches the page’s wording verbatim, including the unusual spellings “ubiquitious” and “bares.” ([patrick-breyer.de](https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-governments-open-the-door-for-biometric-mass-surveillance-in-public-spaces/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Verified. The source URL (patrick-breyer.de, his own official MEP website) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the quote is genuine and verbatim from Patrick Breyer's statements during the EU AI Act negotiations: "a China-style dystopian future of biometric mass surveillance in Europe," the claim of false-positive error rates "up to 99%," that "there is not a single example of real-time biometric surveillance preventing a terrorist attack," and the call that "The European Parliament will need to fight to have this ban implemented in the AI Act!" These match confirmed Breyer/Pirate Party statements. His clear advocacy for banning biometric mass surveillance means the "for" vote on statement #412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") correctly aligns. Year 2022 is correct (statement made around the Dec 2022 Council position on the AI Act); quote remains relevant and was kept. Searched for a verbatim, sourced 2025/2026 Breyer quote to add alongside but found none (his MEP term ended in 2024), so none was added rather than fabricating one. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 9d ago
replying to Patrick Breyer