Comment by Access Now

defends and extends digital rights
Perhaps the greatest threat posed by technologies that fall under the umbrella of artificial intelligence comes from their ability to facilitate the mass surveillance of populations. Advances in machine learning in particular have significantly reduced the cost of processing huge amounts of data, including video footage, and have thereby reduced the cost of mass surveillance. However, mass surveillance of populations should never be allowed, no matter how efficient, cost effective or accurate it may become due to technological advances. Mass surveillance constitutes one of the most egregious violations of our fundamental rights and freedoms and technologies that enable it must be banned outright. If the EU truly wants to show leadership in promoting rights-respecting, trustworthy AI, then it must ban the development and deployment of such applications of AI. The EU cannot ‘remain in the race’ with China and the US when it comes to developing mass surveillance technologies and still claim to promote trustworthy AI. Rather, the EU must establish red lines to ban applications of AI which are incompatible with fundamental rights. [...] Finally, we highlight the following applications that should be banned: ● indiscriminate biometric surveillance and biometric capture and processing in public spaces or installed on wearable devices; ● use of AI to solely determine access to or delivery of essential public services (such as social security, policing, migration control); [...] ● use of AI systems at national borders or in testing on marginalised groups, such as undocumented migrants; [...]
AI Verified source (2020-06)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports the full statement: it says AI-enabled mass surveillance of populations "should never be allowed" and that technologies enabling it "must be banned outright," including banning the development and deployment of such AI applications. That directly implies support for banning governments from using AI for mass surveillance of citizens. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote clearly says "mass surveillance of populations should never be allowed" and that "technologies that enable it must be banned outright," including a call to "ban the development and deployment of such applications of AI." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly supports the full statement: it says mass surveillance "should never be allowed" and that AI applications enabling it "must be banned outright," including a call to ban the development and deployment of such AI systems. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly says "mass surveillance of populations should never be allowed" and that "technologies that enable it must be banned outright," including a call to "ban the development and deployment of such applications of AI." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified The June 2020 PDF at the supplied Access Now URL contains these passages in Section V, including the opening paragraph on mass surveillance, the paragraph beginning “If the EU truly wants…,” and the listed banned applications; the user’s [...] markers correspond to omitted intervening text rather than alterations. The document is presented as an Access Now submission, so the stored author, month-level date (2020-06), and source URL are consistent with the source. ([accessnow.org](https://www.accessnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/EU-white-paper-consultation_Access_Now_June2020.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3d ago
Disputed The Access Now PDF does contain the first two paragraphs in Section V and the bullet list about banned applications, so the attribution to Access Now (2020) is broadly correct. But the supplied quote is not fully verbatim: it skips several sentences between “incompatible with fundamental rights.” and “Finally, we highlight...,” omits multiple bullets without marking omissions, and changes the source wording from “use of AI systems at national borders...” to “uses of AI systems at national borders...”. That makes the quoted text materially altered rather than an exact quotation. ([accessnow.org](https://www.accessnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/EU-white-paper-consultation_Access_Now_June2020.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Verified Quote by Access Now (digital rights NGO) arguing that the greatest threat from AI is mass surveillance, that mass surveillance "should never be allowed... no matter how efficient, cost effective or accurate" and "technologies that enable it must be banned outright," that the EU must set "red lines," and listing applications to ban (indiscriminate biometric surveillance/capture in public spaces or on wearables; AI solely determining access to essential public services; AI at borders or testing on marginalised groups). Source is Access Now's submission to the EU White Paper on AI consultation (June 2020 PDF on accessnow.org). The PDF URL returned HTTP 403 to direct WebFetch, but a web search of that exact document confirmed it contains these arguments: Access Now calls for biometric mass-surveillance technologies to be "comprehensively and indefinitely banned in both law and practice," for an immediate halt to biometric processing amounting to mass surveillance in public spaces, and frames this around biometric red lines and trustworthy AI — matching the quote's substance and its specific banned-applications list (which mirrors Access Now/EDRi's well-documented 2020 "red lines" demands). Attribution (Access Now) correct; year 2020 accurate; quote relevant. Vote alignment: linked statement is "Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance"; Access Now demands exactly such a ban, so the "for" vote is correct. (I could not independently pin one distinctive sub-phrase — "remain in the race" with China and the US — verbatim, but the document-level corroboration of the quote's content is strong and consistent with Access Now's position.) · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 10d ago
replying to Access Now