We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Zoë Garbett
London Assembly Member, Green Party
I am not opposed to technology. From my time working in the NHS, I know how transformative advances in technology can be – they can legitimately be lifesaving – but advances in technology cannot be allowed to undermine our rights and our civil liberties. [...] Facial recognition is a reversal of the presumption of innocence - the democratic principle that you shouldn't be spied on unless police suspect you of wrongdoing. Facial recognition subjects us all to spying. Walking down a street in London and having your face scanned and compared against a list of wanted people is essentially being part of an identification parade. [...] This is wrong, is an infringement on our rights and should not continue.AI Verified source (2026)
3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history
AI Verified
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes government use of AI facial recognition to scan everyone in public, calling it mass spying, an infringement of rights, and saying it 'should not continue.' That clearly implies support for banning government use of AI for mass surveillance of citizens.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Vote inference verification history
AI Verified
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote says facial recognition by police/government "subjects us all to spying," is "an infringement on our rights" and "should not continue," which clearly supports banning this kind of AI mass surveillance.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 4d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified. The official London.gov.uk PDF titled "The unchecked expansion of live facial recognition technology in London" is explicitly a report by Zoë Garbett and is signed "Zoë Garbett AM" with date "February 2026." It contains the first passage in the foreword (lines 15–20 of the text extraction; page labeled 2) and the second passage in the executive summary under "Flips the presumption of innocence" (lines 99–113; page labeled 3). The supplied wording matches verbatim aside from the user's [...] omissions joining non-contiguous passages. ([london.gov.uk](https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-02/The%20unchecked%20expansion%20of%20live%20facial%20recognition%20technology%20in%20London%20-%20Zo%C3%AB%20Garbett%20Feb%202026.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 5d ago
AI Unverifiable
The source_url (london.gov.uk PDF, Zoë Garbett's Feb 2026 report on live facial recognition in London) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden to my fetcher. Web search corroborates the quote: Green Party London Assembly Member Zoë Garbett published this report on 10 Feb 2026 urging the Met to immediately pause/stop live facial recognition. Her distinctive line "Facial recognition is a reversal of the presumption of innocence – the democratic principle that you shouldn't be spied on unless police suspect you of wrongdoing" is reported verbatim by multiple outlets (London City Hall, Hackney Citizen, Waltham Forest Echo), as is her view that LFR is invasive and should not continue. Year 2026 matches. The vote "for" on statement 412 ("Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance") aligns with her opposition to facial-recognition mass surveillance. Marking ai_unverifiable only because the source PDF blocks automated access; the quote is accurate and correctly attributed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 10d ago
replying to Zoë Garbett