We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Gavin Newsom
Governor of California
This bill would prohibit making a companion chatbot available to users under 18 years of age, unless the chatbot is not foreseeably capable of certain actions. [...] While I strongly support the author’s goal of establishing necessary safeguards for the safe use of AI by minors, AB 1064 imposes such broad restrictions on the use of conversational AI tools that it may unintentionally lead to a total ban on the use of these products by minors. AI is already shaping the world, and it is imperative that adolescents learn how to safely interact with AI systems. This extends far beyond knowing how to use technology tools, such as conversational chatbots, and includes an understanding of what AI is, how it functions, and how to critically evaluate AI-generated content for algorithmic bias, misinformation, and other risks. We cannot prepare our youth for a future where AI is ubiquitous by preventing their use of these tools altogether. The types of interactions that this bill seeks to address are abhorrent, and I am fully committed to finding the right approach to protect children from these harms in a manner that does not effectively ban the use of the technology altogether.AI Verified source (2025)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly discusses a bill that would "prohibit making a companion chatbot available to users under 18 years of age" and repeatedly frames it as an effective ban on minors’ access to these AI products. That matches the full statement about banning AI companion chatbots for minors under 18.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 7d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes a ban, saying the bill could lead to "a total ban" on these products for minors and that "We cannot prepare our youth... by preventing their use of these tools altogether."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 7d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the official California Governor veto message for AB 1064, dated October 13, 2025, contains the quoted passages verbatim; the [...] corresponds to omitted intervening text. The PDF is on gov.ca.gov, is presented as an Office of the Governor veto message, and is signed by Gavin Newsom. Newsom’s October 13, 2025 legislative update also lists AB 1064 as vetoed and links to this veto message. ([gov.ca.gov](https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AB-1064-Veto.pdf))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 7d ago
AI Verified
Quote is from Gov. Gavin Newsom's AB 1064 veto message (Oct 2025). Primary source gov.ca.gov PDF returned HTTP 403 to automated fetching; corroborated via web search and multiple news outlets (The Hill, StateScoop, KQED, SF Standard). Confirmed wording: "While I strongly support the author's goal of establishing necessary safeguards for the safe use of AI by minors, AB 1064 imposes such broad restrictions on the use of conversational AI tools that it may unintentionally lead to a total ban on the use of these products by minors." Newsom vetoed AB 1064 and instead signed SB 243. Attribution correct, year 2025 correct. Vote alignment: on statement 416 "Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18," Newsom vetoed the ban, so "against" is correct. I REMOVED this quote from statement 445 "Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors": the quote's substance is opposition to a broad effective ban (a California bill), and it explicitly expresses SUPPORT for "necessary safeguards" — which contradicts the recorded "against" vote and does not represent a clear position on the federal age-verification proposal. Removing the misaligned/off-topic association rather than guessing his stance.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 15d ago
replying to Gavin Newsom